Молодежный инновационный вестникМолодежный инновационный вестник2415-7805Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Воронежский государственный медицинский университет имени Н.Н. Бурденко" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации7488Conference ProceedingsCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MODERN METHODS OF MEASURING THE AREA OF THE WOUND SURFACEBokovDmitry Alexandrovichdmitrybokov01@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-3093MikhailovNikolai Olegovichn.o.mikhailov@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-205XN.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Voronezh, Russia0110202211227312103202221032022Copyright © 2022, Bokov D.A., Mikhailov N.O.2022<p>Relevance. Modern technologies are replacing traditional methods in clinical medicine. This trend is also observed in surgery at the moment, a large number of computer programs and mobile applications have been developed to help a practicing specialist.<br />Goal. To conduct a comparative analysis of modern methods of measuring the area of the wound surface. <br />Materials and methods. The experiment was conducted on the basis of the Research Institute of Experimental Biology and Medicine of the Burdenko State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Over 500 wound surfaces have been analyzed by various methods of measuring wounds. Traditional methods of measuring wounds according to J.I. Kundin, H.N.Mayrovitz and L.N. Popova were used for the study. From computer programs, ImageJ, Universal Desktop Rule were used, from mobile applications - +WoundDesk, V2F, ImitoWounds. To standardize the results, the method of measuring the area of the wound by L.N.Popova was chosen.<br />Results. In comparison with the selected standard, when calculated by the J.I.Kudin method, the average deviation was 23.18%, when calculated by the H.N. Meyrovitz method 30.37%. The deviation when using ImageJ was 12.23%, Universal Desktop Ruler - 13.8%. Mobile applications showed the best results the average deviation when using +WoundDesk was 9.16%, V2F - 11.04%, ImitoWound - 7.49%.<br />Conclusion. The programs used for planimetric studies can serve as a substitute for traditional methods, since they are quite accurate. The use of these technologies can significantly reduce the time used to measure the area, increase the accuracy of measurement, and better display the dynamics of the wound process. Technologies allow you to remove the contact of materials with the wound, and therefore reduce the likelihood of infection of the wound.</p>woundswound surfaceways to measure woundsplanimetrywound processРаныраневая поверхностьспособы измерения ранпланиметрияраневой процесс1.ОПЫТ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ МОБИЛЬНОГО ПРИЛОЖЕНИЯ "+WOUNDDESK" ДЛЯ ОЦЕНКИ ДИНАМИКИ РЕПАРАЦИИ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНЫХ РАН. Будневский А.В., Цветикова Л.Н., Андреев А.А., Карапитьян А.Р., Чуян А.О. Моделирование, оптимизация и информационные технологии. 2017. № 1 (16). С. 1.2.Sigam, P. I. Надежность и точность вычисления площади раневой поверхности с использованием мобильных технологий / P. I. Sigam, M. Denz // Журнал Международного общества телемедицины и электронного здравоохранения - Россия. – 2015. – № 1(1). – С. 38-41.