Молодежный инновационный вестникМолодежный инновационный вестник2415-7805Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Воронежский государственный медицинский университет имени Н.Н. Бурденко" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации7313Conference ProceedingsSIGNIFICANCE OF MRI CRITERIA IN THE STANDARDIZED DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISDudkinNikita Y.fich654@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2672-6788Voronezh State Medical University named after N. N. Burdenko30062022112892941502202205032022Copyright © 2022, Dudkin N.Y.2022<p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the nervous system that has a variety of neurological symptoms. It causes certain difficulties in diagnosis. MS occurs most often at a young age and can lead to disability of patients without proper treatment. This also determines the socio-economic consequences of disease. To prevent such an unfavorable development, it is necessary to verify the diagnosis as quickly and accurately as possible and start disease modifying therapy (DMT). Currently, the method of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI criteria for MS are widely used, which allows to confirm the diagnosis with sufficient accuracy and prescribe appropriate treatment.</p>
<p>The purpose of the study is to show the importance of MRI criteria and their place in a standardized diagnosis of MS.</p>
<p>The main research method is the analysis of various sources of information about MRI diagnostics of MS (Russian and foreign open Internet publications, reports of the regional and federal levels, etc.), highlighting important points, and summarizing them.</p>
<p>Results. There is a fairly complete information about the MRI criteria of MS, the history of their development and a detailed description, and their place in the unification of MS diagnostics.</p>
<p>Conclusion. Based on the obtained data, it can be concluded that MRI criteria are extremely important in the diagnosis of MS and they take a leading position in it. Their use significantly eases verification of the diagnosis and differential diagnosis with other diseases, and allows us to draw conclusions about the presence of the disease, its variant, and the progression of the disease during repeated studies.</p>Multiple sclerosismagnetic resonance imagingMRI-criteriadiagnosis verificationРассеянный склерозмагнитно-резонансная томографияМРТ-критерииверификация диагноза[Шамова Т. М., Бойко Д.В., Гордеев Я. Я. Диагностические критерии рассеянного склероза. Журнал Гродненского государственного медицинского университета. 2007. № 2 (18), с. 9-14.][Соколова Л.И., Кобысь Т.А., Домрес Н.В. Современные критерии Макдональда в диагностике рассеянного склероза. Международный неврологический журнал. 2012. № 7 (53), с. 9-12.][McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. (2001) Annals of neurology. 50 (1): pp. 121-7.][Протасов И.С. Об эффективности и критериях МРТ-диагностики рассеянного склероза. Актуальные проблемы неврологии: материалы Воронежской областной научно-практической конференции неврологов, 20 ноября 2013 г. 2013: с. 110-112.][Брюхов В. В., Кротенкова И. А., Морозова С. Н., Кротенкова М. В. Современный взгляд на МРТ-диагностику рассеянного склероза: обновленные МРТ-критерии 2016 г.. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски. 2017;117(2-2): с. 66-73.][Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2): pp. 162-173.][Брюхов В. В., Кротенкова И. А., Морозова С. Н., Кротенкова М. В. Стандартизация МРТ- исследований при рассеянном склерозе. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски. 2016;116(10-2): с. 27-34.][Hemond CC, Bakshi R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 May.][Tomassini, V., Sinclair, A., Sawlani, V. et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis: MRI in clinical practice. J Neurol 267, pp. 2917–2925 (2020)]