Молодежный инновационный вестникМолодежный инновационный вестник2415-7805Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Воронежский государственный медицинский университет имени Н.Н. Бурденко" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации7282Conference ProceedingsDETERMINING THE OPTIMAL HEART RATE ZONE IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES IN THE GYMIvanovaPolina Evgenyevna<p>Student</p>poliv1303@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4485-3374NefedovaDaria Sergeevna<p>Student</p>nefedova_darya26@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8456-7607FrolovAleksandr Yurievich<p>Student</p>fr0low.4@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7617-7852Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. BurdenkoVoronezh State Medical University named after Nikolay Nilovich Burdenko300620221144461402202223022022Copyright © 2022, Ivanova P.E., Nefedova D.S., Frolov A.Y.2022<p>Purpose: to determine the optimal pulse zone of the class.</p> <p>Methods of the study: 32 second-year medical university students were under observation: 7 boys and 25 girls. The first pulse measurement was made in students at the end of the warm-up. The second measurement of heart rate-after the main part of the class (running for 10 minutes). For each student, the maximum heart rate used to determine the heart rate zone was determined by formula. A 6-minute run was chosen as the zone test.</p> <p>Results: after the warm-up, 87.5% of the students' scores were in the pulse zone 1, and 12.5% were in the pulse zone 2. After the main part of the test 12% of the students belonged to heart rate zone 1, 78% to heart rate zone 2 and 10% to zone 3.</p> <p>Conclusions: the results correspond to the norm, i.e. to heart rate zones 1 and 2. They relate to restorative loads, which is typical for physical activity of medical university students, because there are a large number of untrained people among students. High-intensity loads for them will not correspond to the functional state of the organisms, which will have a negative impact on their health.</p> <p></p>heart raterunningphysical educationпульсбегфизическая культура<p>VI. ACTUALITY</p> <p>Physical education classes are essential for all medical students. It is important to understand the heart rate zone of the exercise program. It is important to know the heart rate zone of the exercise program because it is one of the key factors in the nature of the exercise program. If the pulse zone is high, the physical load does not correspond to the functional state of students, and if the pulse zone is low - the training effect of the lesson is reduced.</p> <p>VII.OBJECTIVE</p> <p>Determine optimal heart rate zone of an activity.</p> <p>VIII. MATERIALS AND METHODS</p> <p>Thirty-two second-year medical university students were under observation: 7 boys and 25 girls engaged in physical education. The first heart rate measurement was taken in the students at the end of the warm-up. The second heart rate measurement was taken after the main part of the activity. A 6-minute run was chosen as the test to determine the heart rate zone. To determine the heart rate zone, it is necessary to understand the division into groups according to the degree of exertion. Pulse zones are divided into 5 groups: Zone 1 (55-65% of MHR) - used at minimum loads on the body. Zone 2 (65-75% of MHR) - used for longer loads. For example, running for a certain length of time while still being able to speak in small sentences.Zone 3 (80-85% of MHR) is a zone in which a person can speak in single words while engaged in physical activity.Zone 4 (85-88% of MHR) is used when the body recycles lactic acid as energy. On the basis of these data, we made calculations using the formula that is used in physical education classes: MHRR=207-0.7*the age of the student in years. MHRF was calculated separately for students of each age (18-21 years). Zone=(HR/MHSS)*100%.</p> <p>IX. RESULTS</p> <p>After the warm-up, 87.5% of the students' scores were in pulse zone 1 and 12.5% were in pulse zone 2. After the main portion, 12% of the students were in heart rate zone 1, 78% were in heart rate zone 2, and 10% were in heart rate zone 3. MHSS (age 18) =207-0.7*18=194.4MHSS (age 19) =207-0.7*19=193.7MHSS (age 20) =207-0.7*20=193MHSS (age 21) =207-0.7*21=192.3Average HR after warm-up (age 18) = 90.1 beats per minute, which is 46.4% of MHSS (pulse zone 1). Average HR after running (18 years) = 111.9 beats per minute, which is 57.6% of MHR (1 pulse zone).Average HR after warm-up (19 years) = 88.2 beats per minute, which is 45.5% of MHR (1 pulse zone). Average HR after running (age 19) = 110.9 beats per minute, which is 57% of MHR (1 pulse zone).Average HR after warm-up (age 20) = 91.7 beats per minute, which is 47.5% of MHR (1 pulse zone). Average HR after running (age 20) = 111.7 beats per minute, which is 57.9% of MHR (1 pulse zone).Average HR after warm-up (age 21) = 100 beats per minute, which is 52% of MHR (1 pulse zone).Average HR after running (age 21) = 121 beats per minute, which is 63% of MHR (2 pulse zone).</p> <p>X. DISCUSSION</p> <p>After a warm-up run, the scores fall within the percentage range of the first heart rate zone, which is normal. After continuous running, most of the students' results enter heart rate zone 2, therefore, the selected load is appropriate for them. Physical activity was inadequate for students whose results fit into heart rate zone 1 and excessive for students whose results fit into zone 3.</p> <p>XI.CONCLUSION</p> <p>The average results of the study correspond to the norm, i.e., pulse zones 1 and 2. They relate to restorative loads, which is typical for physical activity of medical university students, because there are a large number of untrained people among students. High-intensity loads for them will not correspond to the functional state of the organisms, which will have a negative impact on their health.</p>1.Добрынина В.И. “Влияние физической работы на организм человека” 2005 г.2.Мориц О.Е. “Влияние физической работы на артериальное кровяное давление” 2009г.3.Епифанов В.А. “Лечебная физическая культура” 2017г.