<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">Applied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny)</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny)</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2070-9277</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko - The State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko» of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11565</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18499/2070-9277-2026-29-1-25-32</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparative Analysis of Digital Methods for Transferring Maxillary Position: &#13;
A Single-Center Non-Randomized Clinical Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eliseev</surname><given-names>Sergei Vasilyevich</given-names></name><bio>&lt;p&gt;orthopedic dentist&lt;/p&gt;</bio><email>eliseew92@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff-1">White Crow Dental Clinic</aff><pub-date date-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-07" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><pub-date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-04-01"><day>01</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, Applied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny)</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year></permissions><abstract>&lt;p&gt;Digital technologies for transferring the spatial position of the upper jaw into a virtual articulator are becoming an integral part of the modern orthopedic protocol, but the comparability of various digital registration methods remains a matter of debate. The accuracy of the transfer directly determines the correctness of the modeling of occlusive relationships and the functional predictability of orthopedic designs. The purpose of the study is to compare the accuracy of maxillary position transfer using digital methods: the Просистем P-Art axiographic system and the SAM Аксиопризма digital facial arc. The study included 42 patients who underwent: cone-beam computed tomography, intraoral scanning and recording of spatial parameters using the compared methods. The analysis was carried out by comparing the obtained data with the reference CBCT model with the assessment of linear deviations in the vertical, sagittal and transversal directions. Statistically significant differences between the study methods were found in a number of spatial parameters, while both technologies demonstrated a clinically acceptable level of reproducibility. The data obtained clarify the applicability boundaries of digital registration protocols and can be used in planning orthopedic treatment in a full digital working scheme.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>digital dentistry</kwd><kwd>virtual articulator</kwd><kwd>facial arch</kwd><kwd>axiography</kwd><kwd>maxillary position transfer.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>цифровая стоматология</kwd><kwd>виртуальный артикулятор</kwd><kwd>лицевая дуга</kwd><kwd>аксиография</kwd><kwd>перенос положения верхней челюсти.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. Kordaß B, Hugger A, Bernhardt O. Digital methods in prosthodontics and virtual articulators. Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(2):101–112. ISSN: 1463-4201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Solaberrieta E, Etxaniz O, Minguez R, Munoz E. Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jun;109(6):411–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.02.021; PMID: 24836282</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of digital facebow transfer. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):367–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital versus conventional occlusal analysis in prosthodontics. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1569-x; PMID: 26283083.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5. Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(6):463–471. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12497; PMID: 28471544.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6. Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. Digital workflow in modern prosthodontics. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(2):121–127. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4688; PMID: 27095469.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7. Kordaß B, Gärtner C. Electronic axiography and virtual articulators in functional diagnostics. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):15–28. ISSN: 1463-4201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8. Revilla-León M, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):146–158. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9. Revilla-León M, Rubio-Serrano M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Gómez-Polo M. Virtual facebow techniques for mounting digital casts in a virtual articulator: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):472–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.018; PMID: 32898953.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of conventional and digital facebow transfer. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):561–569. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.014; PMID: 25069469.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11. Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Evaluation of the accuracy of a virtual articulator. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(4):775–782. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5074; PMID: 28821602.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12. Solaberrieta E, Arias A, Brizuela A, Pradies G. Determining the accuracy of digital mounting techniques in a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(4):468–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.010; PMID: 26774679.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13. Mangano F, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C. Digital dentistry: clinical and technical limitations. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01121-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14. Revilla-León M, Özcan M, Sierraalta M. Limitations of current digital articulation systems. J. Prosthodont. 2022;31(1):3–10. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13474; PMID: 35048357.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
